The professor makes sure to point out the United States Supreme Court case that allows your right to remain silent against you unless you specifically, and properly, invoke the right to remain silent. He takes a well thought out approach and offers a great plan of stating your name, and saying simply that you want a lawyer. Saying that you want a lawyer ends any interrogation, creating a situation where you don’t have to say your remaining silent in the first place and taking the power away from the police.
I have said many times to say you want to be silent and you want a lawyer (thus lawyer up). However, time and time again, people talk with police and walk themselves into trouble. People often think they can tell the truth and get out of trouble. Sometimes you might be right; others, you might be wrong, and part of your story fits their story and WHOA now your being charged with a crime. Still want to bank on "might" get out of trouble?
The question now is- Do you really have the right to remain silent? Here I am going to discuss why I raise the question, and I bet you will be very surprised to learn many things such as the current state of the law following Salinas v. Texas from the United States Supreme Court sets out that your silence can be used against you unless you actually say you want to remain silent.
